Yes — Many Probate Disputes in Arizona Are Resolved Without Trial
While probate disputes can be emotional and complex, not every conflict requires a full courtroom trial. In fact, Arizona law and the Arizona probate court specifically encourages settlement and mediation whenever possible. Many cases resolve through negotiation, mediation, or stipulated agreements, saving time, money, and family relationships.
How Informal Resolution Works
Before or even after a lawsuit is filed, the parties can often reach agreement through:
-
Direct negotiation between attorneys
-
Mediation with a neutral professional
-
Informal settlement conferences with or without a mediator or court supervision
-
Stipulated orders or consent decrees filed with the probate court
Once a settlement is reached, it can be approved and enforced by the court like any other judgment.
Benefits of Mediation and Settlement
Choosing to settle instead of litigate offers several advantages:
-
Privacy: Avoids public court records and testimony.
-
Speed: Resolves disputes in weeks or months, not years.
-
Cost savings: Dramatically reduces attorney’s fees and court costs.
-
Control: Parties decide the outcome, rather than a judge.
-
Preservation of relationships: Particularly valuable in family conflicts.
Most probate judges require a settlement conference or mediation before setting a trial date.
Types of Probate and Trust Cases where Mediation is Especially Worthwhile in Arizona
- 1. Family Disputes Over Fairness of Distributions: When beneficiaries disagree about the value of or how trust or estate property should be divided, mediation helps preserve relationships while finding compromise. Common example: siblings fighting over perceived favoritism or sentimental items or disagree over the value of property to be allocated to one versus the other.
- 2. Accounting and Transparency Conflicts: If beneficiaries believe a trustee or personal representative isn’t providing full information but there’s no clear evidence of theft or fraud, mediation can often resolve it. A neutral mediator can help negotiate document exchange, timelines, and limited account reviews without the cost of formal litigation.
- 3. Disputes Over Undue Influence or Capacity (When Evidence Is Mixed): When some family members suspect manipulation or mental decline but the evidence isn’t conclusive, mediation lets everyone tell their story in a controlled setting. This approach can uncover underlying emotional issues and lead to settlements that honor intent without destroying family ties.
- 4. Real Estate and Joint Ownership Conflicts: When heirs or beneficiaries jointly inherit real estate, they may disagree on whether to sell, refinance, or buy each other out.
Mediation can help craft buyout terms, sale procedures, or usage agreements — avoiding court-ordered partition or forced sales. - 5. Fee or Expense Disputes Between Fiduciaries and Beneficiaries: Arguments over trustee compensation, attorney’s fees, or management costs are often better resolved through mediation. A mediator can guide parties to agree on fair compensation or reimbursement without prolonged billing reviews or hearings.
At Berk Law Group, We Aim for Resolution — But Prepare for Trial
Our Scottsdale, Arizona probate and trust litigation attorneys know when to negotiate and when to fight. We resolve many disputes through mediation and settlement, but we’re fully prepared to go to court if fairness requires it. Contact us today to discuss your case and learn the best path to resolution.
Watch this video to learn about settlement probate and trust conferences.
What to expect at an Arizona contested probate or trust settlement conference
Related FAQ’s
Can You Remove a Personal Representative or Trustee in Arizona?
What Happens When a Personal Representative or Trustee Won’t Communicate?
