• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Berk Law Group

Arizona Probate Litigation Attorneys

Request a $400 Consultation

480.607.7900

  • About Us
  • Team BLG
    • Kent Berk
    • Daphne Reaume
    • Dan Otsuki
    • Josianne Griffin
    • Steven Santoro
    • Bear, Dog
    • Baxter, Dog
    • Sammy, Dog
  • Reviews
    • Reviews
    • Video Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Probate, Trust & Estate Contests, Disputes & Litigation Lawyers in Arizona
    • Guardianships and Conservatorships
    • Financial Exploitation of Vulnerable Adults
    • Abuse & Neglect of Vulnerable Adults
  • Videos
  • Resources
    • FAQs
    • Blog
  • Contact us
    • Location

APPRAISERS MAY BE CHARGED WITH BANK FRAUD

By Kent Berk on November 12th, 2009 in BLOG, REAL ESTATE LAW

Although the main focus of this site is civil (not criminal) liability of appraisers for negligent misconduct, the government does have the right to bring criminal charges against appraisers who commit fraud and other criminal misconduct. One such example is the indictment brought against appraiser Kurt Douglas Holm for, among other charges, Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud and Bank Fraud.

According to the indictment filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona on March 26, 2008, the alleged co-conspirators “directed appraiser Holm to prepare appraisals that valued the properties at a price required to make a profit on the sale rather than the actual value of the property. This was done by providing Holm the amount of loan needed before he conducted the appraisal. Holm inflated the value of the property by including in the appraisal improvements to the property that did not exist. For example, he included non-existent improvements such as roads, sewer systems and electricity.” This was all allegedly done in order to inflate the value of the property and to obtain loans for more than the true value of the property. But, on November 3, 2009, the United States filed its Motion to Dismiss the charges against Appraiser Holm without prejudice (meaning the charges could be refiled) becuase it was in the best interests of the government. On November 5, 2009, the Court entered its Order dismissing the charges against Mr. Holm.

Primary Sidebar

Contact Us Today

  • Hidden
  • I agree with the Disclaimer.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

What Our Clients Say

“There is no reason to look any further. Just call Kent and you will know you have found the right person for the case. Thoughtful, determined and confident, you cannot ask for more. Kent is the Best of the Best!” – Mary R.

Read All Reviews

Video Resources

Please watch our videos to learn more about important legal issues. We hope that they help you gain a better understanding of the law and how it can apply to your situation.

Watch Videos
Berk Law Group, P.C. 14220 N. Northsight Boulevard, Suite 135 Scottsdale, AZ 85260
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2023
Berk Law Group
Disclaimer

Privacy Policy

Sitemap

  • About Us
  • Team BLG
    ▼
    • Kent Berk
    • Daphne Reaume
    • Dan Otsuki
    • Josianne Griffin
    • Steven Santoro
    • Bear, Dog
    • Baxter, Dog
    • Sammy, Dog
  • Reviews
    ▼
    • Reviews
    • Video Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    ▼
    • Probate, Trust & Estate Contests, Disputes & Litigation Lawyers in Arizona
    • Guardianships and Conservatorships
    • Financial Exploitation of Vulnerable Adults
    • Abuse & Neglect of Vulnerable Adults
  • Videos
  • Resources
    ▼
    • FAQs
    • Blog
  • Contact us
    ▼
    • Location